Ramona paints in Chimayo and has eleven canvases hanging in a Canyon Road gallery in Santa Fe. In early October the gallery filed Chapter 7 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Albuquerque, and a note on the locked door names the trustee. The gallery’s bank holds a filed lien on “all inventory.” Are those paintings still hers?
Ramona is fictional, but her problem is not. New Mexico has a 1979 statute written for artists like her, and no court has squared it with Article 9 or the Bankruptcy Code.
Can I take back consigned art when a New Mexico gallery files bankruptcy?
Not on your own. The automatic stay in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(3) bars “any act to obtain possession of property of the estate,” and the trustee will treat everything on the walls as estate property. Under § 704(a)(1), the trustee must “collect and reduce to money the property of the estate.”
Start by sending the trustee your agreement and a photo inventory. A trustee who agrees can abandon the work under § 554. Otherwise the bankruptcy judge decides, on a motion for stay relief or in an adversary proceeding “to determine the validity, priority, or extent of a lien or other interest in property” under Bankruptcy Rule 7001(b).
What does the New Mexico Artists’ Consignment Act protect?
NMSA 1978, § 56-11-2 defines “art” as “a painting, sculpture, drawing, work of graphic art, pottery, weaving, batik, macrame or quilt” bearing “the artist’s original handwritten signature.” “Artist” includes, after death, “the artist’s heirs or personal representative,” and an “art dealer” is “a person primarily engaged in the business of selling works of art.”
The operative rule is NMSA 1978, § 56-11-3. A work delivered to an art dealer “for the purpose of exhibition or sale,” and the artist’s share of the sale proceeds, “shall create a priority in favor of the artist over the claims, liens or security interests of the creditors of the art dealer, notwithstanding any provision of the Uniform Commercial Code.” The Act borrows the UCC’s definition of “creditor,” which in NMSA 1978, § 55-1-201(b)(13) includes “a lien creditor” and “a trustee in bankruptcy.”
New York’s Arts and Cultural Affairs Law § 12.01 makes consigned work “trust property” and proceeds “trust funds” that never become the dealer’s property. New Mexico says only “priority.” I found no reported decision applying § 56-11-3 and no amendment since 1979.
Does UCC 9-319 give the trustee or the bank my consigned work?
Outside the Act, usually yes. Article 9 covers consignments (NMSA 1978, § 55-9-109(a)(4)), and the definition in § 55-9-102(a)(20) reaches deliveries worth $1,000 or more to a merchant for sale. Under § 55-9-319(a), while the consignee holds the goods, its creditors may treat it as having “rights and title to the goods identical to those the consignor had.” Section 55-9-103(d) calls the consignor’s interest “a purchase-money security interest in inventory.”
In bankruptcy, § 544(a)(1) gives the trustee a judicial lien creditor’s rights at filing, “without regard to any knowledge.” An unperfected interest loses to a lien creditor (§ 55-9-317(a)(2)) and to a perfected lender (§ 55-9-322(a)(2)). In IPC (USA), Inc. v. Ellis (In re Pettit Oil Co.), 917 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2019), a fuel consignor that never filed lost the fuel and the prepetition sale proceeds. I found no Tenth Circuit or Tenth Circuit BAP decision on § 9-319.
The artist’s case is different. Section 56-11-3 overrides “any provision” of the UCC as against the dealer’s creditors, a group that includes the trustee, and § 544(a) takes state law as it finds it. A trustee or bank would answer that Article 9, reenacted in 2001, has no art exception, or that the artist’s priority is a “statutory lien” under § 101(53) that § 545(2) lets a trustee avoid if a bona fide purchaser would take free of it. Without trust language, a § 541(d) argument that the gallery held only bare legal title is weaker here than in New York. Applying it to a given contract is a question for New Mexico counsel.
Your Consigned Work Is Stuck in a Bankruptcy? Contact Us Now
What if a shop is generally known to sell other people’s goods?
Jewelry at a Taos boutique or estate furniture at a Santa Fe resale shop falls outside the Act. The escape hatch is the definition: a deal is not an Article 9 consignment if the merchant is “generally known by its creditors to be substantially engaged in selling the goods of others.” If proven, § 9-319 never applies.
In In re Valley Media, Inc., 279 B.R. 105 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002), the consignor bore the burden of showing “that a majority of the debtor-consignee’s creditors were aware,” counted by number rather than dollars, and “[t]estimony as to general knowledge in the industry is insufficient.” The court also looked for at least 20 percent of inventory value on consignment; Valley peaked at 17.03 percent, and the vendors lost. A gallery full of consigned work passes the percentage test easily; proving what its creditors knew is the hard part.
Collectors have another route: a painting that hung in your living room was arguably a consumer good “immediately before delivery,” outside § 55-9-102(a)(20)(C). A Massachusetts court left such consignments to the common law in In re Haley & Steele, Inc., 20 Mass. L. Rptr. 204 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2005).
What deadlines and claims matter if the gallery owes me money?
File a proof of claim anyway. Under Rule 3002(c), restyled effective December 1, 2024, a claim in a voluntary Chapter 7 is timely “within 70 days after the order for relief.” If the first notice predicted no dividend, Rule 3002(c)(5) requires at least 90 days’ notice of a new deadline once one appears possible (see how long a New Mexico Chapter 7 takes).
Supplier remedies rarely fit a consignor, who sold nothing. Reclamation under § 546(c) belongs to “a seller of goods that has sold goods to the debtor” and needs a written demand within 45 days after receipt (or 20 days after filing, if later). The § 503(b)(9) claim covers goods received within 20 days before filing and “sold to the debtor” (compare the firm’s post on supplier rights when a customer files).
For work already sold, the Act’s priority reaches the artist’s share of proceeds, but money swept into an operating account may be untraceable. Against an individual dealer, § 523(a)(4) excepts debts for “defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity,” but the Tenth Circuit requires “an express or technical trust,” Fowler Bros. v. Young (In re Young), 91 F.3d 1367 (10th Cir. 1996). A statute qualifies only if it defines the trust res and spells out “the fiduciary duty,” In re Kelley, 215 B.R. 468 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 1997). New Mexico’s Act does neither. That complaint is due 60 days after the first date set for the § 341 meeting (Rule 4007(c)). If a gallery files Subchapter V instead, § 1184 gives it the trustee’s powers, strong-arm included.
How would Ramona’s canvases fare, and what would a UCC-1 have changed?
Illustration only. The gallery, a New Mexico LLC, filed on Monday, October 5, 2026. Ramona’s eleven signed canvases are priced at $84,000 with a 50 percent commission, so her share is $42,000. The bank filed its UCC-1 on “all inventory” in 2023. Ramona never filed.
The trustee will cite § 55-9-319, and the bank will cite § 55-9-322(a)(2). Ramona will answer that signed paintings delivered to an art dealer sit squarely within § 56-11-3, whose priority runs against both “notwithstanding any provision” of the UCC. On the unsold canvases, I think her argument is stronger, though untested. Her claims deadline would be Monday, December 14, 2026.
Suppose instead that before delivery she had filed a UCC-1 with the New Mexico Secretary of State (§ 55-9-501(a)(2)), naming the gallery as debtor in consignor terms (§ 55-9-505(a)), and sent the bank a signed notice describing the paintings. Under § 55-9-324(b), amended in 2023, her purchase-money interest beats the bank’s if perfected when the gallery takes possession and the bank gets the notice within the prior five years. Perfection also defeats the trustee. File in the gallery’s state of organization (§ 55-9-307(e)) and continue the filing before its five-year lapse (§ 55-9-515(a)). Her agreement should keep title in her name and put sale proceeds in a separate account, with inspection rights and return on demand.
| Consignor’s position | Against the trustee | Against the bank’s blanket lien | Practical remedy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artist under NMSA § 56-11-3 | Statutory priority; untested against §§ 544 and 545 | Statute says artist first; untested | Demand return; litigate if refused |
| Filed UCC-1 and sent § 9-324(b) notice | Perfected; prevails | Purchase-money priority | Seek abandonment or stay relief |
| Filed UCC-1 only | Perfected; prevails | Likely loses to the earlier-filed lien | Negotiate with the bank |
| Did nothing | Loses under §§ 9-319 and 544(a) | Loses | Unsecured proof of claim |
| Shop “generally known” to sell others’ goods | Outside Article 9 if proven | Outside Article 9 if proven | Adversary proceeding; proof is costly |
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the New Mexico Artists’ Consignment Act protect photographers or jewelers?
Probably not. Neither photographs nor jewelry appears on the Act’s list of covered works, so those consignors rely on Article 9.
Can I pick up my paintings from a gallery that just filed bankruptcy?
Not without the trustee’s agreement or a court order. Self-help risks violating the automatic stay, even if you own them.
Does a UCC-1 alone protect a consignor against the gallery’s bank?
Not if the bank filed first on inventory. You also need the signed notice under § 55-9-324(b), received before the gallery takes possession. The filing alone does protect you against the trustee.
Can an artist’s estate use the Act?
Yes. “Artist” includes a deceased artist’s heirs or personal representative. A collector who bought the work is not covered.
Is money from sold artwork held in trust in New Mexico?
The statute does not say so. It gives the artist a priority in her share of proceeds, which is hard to enforce once the money is commingled.
How North Star Law Firm Can Help
North Star Law Firm represents consignors and gallery owners in New Mexico bankruptcy cases, including Chapter 7 cases where a trustee claims consigned stock and Subchapter V cases where a gallery keeps operating.
Phillip Zagotti, JD/CPA, is admitted to the U.S. District Court and Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Mexico and represents taxpayers before the IRS and the U.S. Tax Court. The firm works alongside New Mexico-licensed counsel on state-law questions. If your work is on a gallery wall when the doors close, contact North Star Law Firm.