🎧 Listen to this article — North Star Tax and Legal Briefing
Listen on Podbean · 4 min 47 sec
Read the episode transcript
If your business took a pandemic loan, bills Medicare or Medicaid, sells into a federal contract, or moves goods through the border corridor, the Justice Department just published the list it is working from — and New Mexico is all over it. In August, the Department’s new National Fraud Enforcement Division issued a memorandum naming five enforcement priorities, backed by a build-out to roughly 500 attorneys and staff, plus data scientists and asset recovery lawyers. Most business owners assume a Washington reorganization is someone else’s problem. Here is the uncomfortable truth: those five priorities map almost perfectly onto the New Mexico economy.
Start with what this division actually is. Federal fraud enforcement used to be scattered across offices and agencies. The new division consolidates it under one command, and its memorandum names five targets: fraud in government programs, health care fraud, criminal tax enforcement, trade fraud, and corporate misconduct. Two themes run through all five, and they matter more than the list itself. First, data analytics is now the lead investigative tool. Cases do not start with a tip anymore — they start with an algorithm cross-matching loan files, tax returns, and bank records before any human opens an investigation. Second, nationwide coordination means cases move to wherever the evidence sits, including districts like New Mexico that have never hosted large fraud sections. Here is the distinction to hold onto: you no longer need to be noticed to be found. You just need to be in the data.
Here is how it operates in practice. The first priority expressly includes fraud affecting disaster relief and small business support programs — a direct line to pandemic-era loans. A borrower who overstated revenue on an application, spent disaster loan money personally, or kept drawing after the business shut down can surface in a data match years later. And Congress gave the government a ten-year statute of limitations on pandemic loan fraud, reaching into the mid-2030s on many loans. The tax piece changes charging psychology. With criminal tax work housed inside a fraud division, prosecutors reach for familiar tools — wire fraud, false statements — alongside the felony tax charges, building cases faster and stacking exposure higher, and a return preparer under scrutiny becomes a roadmap to every return in that office. Now the parts that cut the other way. The audit process itself has not changed. Cooperation still earns credit — the memo promises it. A voluntary disclosure made before an investigation opens generally still takes prosecution off the table. And being near a priority sector is not an accusation: plenty of clean businesses will simply see more subpoenas and record demands.
Why New Mexico specifically? Match the list to the state’s economic base. Procurement and grant dollars flow through contractors supporting the national laboratories and military installations — exactly where billing fraud theories operate. Rural hospitals, clinics, and home health agencies bill Medicaid in a state with among the highest Medicaid enrollment shares in the country, and telehealth billing across our distances is precisely the pattern the strike forces study. Importers moving goods through the Santa Teresa port of entry inherit the trade priorities. Oil and gas activity in the southeast corner generates the royalty and depletion complexity that criminal tax teams mine for concealed income. And here is what compounds it: a loan workout, an offer in compromise, or a bankruptcy each generates sworn financial disclosures, and enforcement teams can read those too. Sequence matters — assess criminal exposure first.
So what do you do this week? Three moves. First, self-audit the files the government would pull — loan applications, use-of-proceeds records, billing patterns, procurement certifications, and the last several years of returns — and read them the way an analyst would. Second, fix what is fixable through the front door while it is still open: amended returns, repayment negotiations, voluntary disclosure. Third, plan the response before the knock — who accepts a subpoena, who calls counsel, what employees say when an agent appears at the counter. The businesses that fare worst in an enforcement wave are the ones improvising on day one. That’s what we do at North Star Law Firm. The initial consultation is free, and the full written analysis with citations is at nm-legal.net.
Federal fraud enforcement just got a new command structure, a bigger budget, and a published target list. On August 13, 2026, Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald of the Department of Justice’s National Fraud Enforcement Division issued a memorandum laying out five enforcement priorities and describing a build-out to roughly 500 attorneys and staff, supported by data scientists, asset recovery lawyers, and a nationwide coordination model. New Mexico businesses might assume a Washington reorganization is someone else’s problem. It is not. The priorities the memo names, government program fraud, healthcare fraud, criminal tax enforcement, trade fraud, and corporate misconduct, map almost perfectly onto the New Mexico economy: federal contractors and lab suppliers, rural healthcare providers, small businesses that took pandemic-era loans, and importers moving goods through the border corridor.
What are the Fraud Division’s five priorities?
The memorandum organizes the division’s work around five substantive areas. Public trust and financial integrity covers procurement fraud, bid-rigging, billing fraud, and fraud in grant and benefit programs, expressly including disaster relief and small business support initiatives. Healthcare fraud targets telemedicine schemes, Medicare and Medicaid fraud, kickbacks, and home health and hospice abuse, with an expanded strike force model. Criminal tax enforcement folds tax prosecutions into the broader fraud mission, naming false return preparation, concealed income, and promotion of unlawful tax schemes. Global trade and commerce aims at customs evasion, transshipment, country-of-origin fraud, and undervaluation, run through a cross-agency task force. Corporate misconduct rounds out the list, paired with a promise that self-disclosure, cooperation, and remediation will keep earning credit.
Two themes cut across all five: data analytics as the lead investigative tool, and nationwide coordination that moves cases wherever the evidence sits, including into districts like New Mexico that have not historically hosted large fraud sections.
Why should EIDL and PPP borrowers in New Mexico pay attention?
The first priority’s reference to fraud affecting “small-business support initiatives” is a direct line to pandemic-loan enforcement. Data-driven review is how those cases start: loan files, tax returns, and bank records are cross-matched by algorithm before any human ever opens an investigation. A borrower who overstated revenue on an application, used Economic Injury Disaster Loan proceeds for personal spending, or kept drawing on a loan after the business stopped operating can surface in that matching years after the fact, and the ten-year statute of limitations Congress enacted for pandemic loan fraud gives the government until the mid-2030s on many loans. The practical point is not panic; it is sequencing. A borrower with a problem file should have counsel assess criminal exposure before entering any workout, offer in compromise, or bankruptcy, because each of those processes generates sworn financial disclosures that enforcement teams can read too.
Worried About a Federal Loan or Tax Exposure? Contact Us Now
What does integrated criminal tax enforcement mean for taxpayers?
Housing criminal tax work inside a fraud division changes charging psychology. Prosecutors reaching for familiar tools like wire fraud and false statements alongside the tax crimes in 26 U.S.C. § 7201 and § 7206 can build cases faster and stack exposure higher. The memo’s focus on false return preparation also means preparer investigations, and preparer clients, stay squarely in view; a preparer under scrutiny becomes a roadmap to every return in the office. For a taxpayer whose filings have problems, the traditional pressure valves still work, but they are timing-sensitive. A voluntary disclosure made before an investigation opens is a powerful mitigation tool; the same facts volunteered after a data-analytics referral is a confession. An audit that starts feeling like more than an audit, with duplicative document requests, bank summonses, or questions about intent, deserves criminal-defense attention immediately, before another interview happens.
Which New Mexico industries sit closest to the target list?
Match the memo to the state’s economic base and the overlap is striking. Federal procurement and grant dollars flow through contractors and subcontractors supporting the national laboratories and military installations, exactly where procurement fraud and billing fraud theories operate. Rural hospitals, clinics, home health agencies, and behavioral health providers bill Medicare and Medicaid in a state with among the highest Medicaid enrollment shares in the country, and telehealth billing across New Mexico’s distances is precisely the pattern the strike force model studies. Import-heavy businesses moving goods through the Santa Teresa port of entry inherit the trade priorities, where country-of-origin and valuation cases can be charged criminally rather than handled as customs disputes. And the oil and gas activity in the southeast corner generates the royalty, severance, and depletion complexity that criminal tax teams mine for concealed-income cases. None of this requires wrongdoing to matter: proximity to priority sectors raises the odds of subpoenas, audits, and third-party record demands even for clean businesses.
What should a business do now, before any contact from the government?
Three moves cost little and change outcomes. First, self-audit the files the government would pull: federal loan applications and use-of-proceeds records, healthcare billing patterns, procurement certifications, and the last several years of returns, read the way an analyst would read them. Second, fix what is fixable through the front door, amended returns, repayment negotiations, or voluntary disclosure, while those doors remain open; the memo’s cooperation-credit language applies to companies that find and report their own problems. Third, plan the response before the knock: who accepts a subpoena, who calls counsel, what employees say when an agent appears at the counter. The businesses that fare worst in enforcement waves are the ones improvising on day one.
| Fraud Division priority | New Mexico exposure point | First defensive step |
|---|---|---|
| Public trust and financial integrity | Lab and base contractors; EIDL and PPP borrowers; grant recipients | Self-audit loan files and procurement certifications |
| Healthcare fraud | Medicaid-heavy providers, telehealth, home health and hospice | Billing pattern review against strike force data models |
| Criminal tax enforcement | Cash-intensive businesses, preparer clients, oil and gas complexity | Evaluate voluntary disclosure before contact |
| Global trade and commerce | Border-corridor importers and logistics operators | Verify origin, valuation, and classification files |
| Corporate misconduct | Any company with federal touchpoints | Document compliance program and response plan |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the DOJ National Fraud Enforcement Division?
A division created in 2026 that consolidates federal fraud enforcement, with a memorandum issued August 13, 2026 setting five priorities: government program fraud, healthcare fraud, criminal tax enforcement, trade fraud, and corporate misconduct, backed by planned growth to about 500 attorneys and staff.
Are EIDL and PPP loans still being investigated in 2026?
Yes. Fraud affecting small business support and disaster relief programs is an express priority, Congress extended the statute of limitations for pandemic loan fraud to ten years, and data analytics keeps generating new referrals from old loan files.
Does the memo change anything for ordinary tax audits?
The audit process itself is unchanged, but criminal tax enforcement is now integrated with fraud prosecutors who charge tax and non-tax offenses together. Audits showing badges of fraud can escalate faster, which makes early counsel involvement more valuable.
What is voluntary disclosure and when does it help?
It is a structured way to correct past noncompliance before an investigation begins, which generally takes criminal prosecution off the table for a truthful, timely, complete disclosure. Its protection depends on getting there before the government identifies you.
Should a New Mexico business with a clean record do anything?
Yes: know your paper. Priority-sector businesses face more subpoenas and third-party demands even without wrongdoing, so organized loan, billing, and tax files plus a response plan turn an alarming letter into an administrative task.
How North Star Law Firm Can Help
North Star Law Firm represents New Mexico businesses and individuals facing federal financial exposure, from EIDL and SBA loan problems to tax controversies that carry criminal risk. Phillip Zagotti, JD/CPA, pairs legal defense strategy with the forensic accounting these data-driven cases are built on, and sequences resolution work so that sworn disclosures help rather than hurt. The firm’s tax defense practice covers audit defense and unfiled return correction, and its bankruptcy practice evaluates whether restructuring belongs in the plan at all once enforcement risk is assessed. Contact North Star Law Firm for a confidential review before the government’s analysts review the file for you.